- Using relationship designators for other types of relationships (for example, contributor relationships), is strongly encouraged.
- Include a relationship designator, even if it repeats a term used as a qualifier to the name.
- Consult RDA Appendix I.2.1: Relationship Designators for Creators. Remember that the relationship designators that are used with creators are on the list in RDA Appendix I.2.1, not on the lists in I.2.2 or I.3.1.
- It is recommended that PCC catalogers use relationship designators from the RDA appendices. If the term needed is not there, use the Fast Track PCC relationship designator proposal form to propose a new term or request a revision of an existing term.
Guideline 1: Use of this Training Manual
This training manual is intended to be used as a resource when applying relationship designators in RDA bibliographic records. It does not apply to authority records.
Guideline 2: Sources for Relationship Designators
It is recommended that PCC catalogers use relationship designators from the RDA appendices. If the term needed is not there, use the PCC relationship designator proposal form to propose a new term or request a revision of an existing term.
If a PCC cataloger wishes to use a term from a different registered vocabulary (e.g., MARC relator terms, RBMS relationship designators
, etc.), he/she may do so.
Guideline 3: Specificity
Within a hierarchy of relationship designators, prefer a specific term to a general one if it is easily determined. For example, use librettist rather than author for the creator of a libretto, or lyricist rather than author for the creator of the words for songs in a musical.
Guideline 4: RDA Element Name as Relationship Designator
Assign an RDA element name as a relationship designator (e.g., "creator" (19.2) or "publisher" (21.3)) if it will most appropriately express the relationship.
However, do not propose RDA element names for inclusion in RDA relationship designator lists.
Guideline 5: Unclear Relationship
If the nature of the relationship cannot be ascertained even at a general level, do not assign a relationship designator.
Guideline 6: Adding a Relationship Designator to Existing Terms and/or Codes
Do not evaluate or edit older codes or terms in cataloging records unless they are clearly in error. Add an RDA relationship designator following an existing term, and before any existing code.
Guideline 7: Applying Relationship Designators in Accordance with their Definitions
Be careful to apply relationship designators in accordance with their definitions. For example, note the difference between artist and illustrator. If the definitions or the hierarchies appear to be problematic, propose changes to them. Fast Track procedures are in process. See the PCC Relationship Designator Proposal Form
Guideline 8: Access Point and Relationship Designator for an Entity Not Named in a Resource
In general, it is not necessary to provide access points for related entities not named in the resource. However, other sources of information may be consulted to identify related entities and determine the nature of their relationship to the resource.
Guidelines for Appendix I Relationship Designators
Guideline 9: Relationship Designators for All Access Points
PCC highly encourages including relationship designators for all access points whenever it is clear what the relationship is.
Guideline 10: More than One Relationship Designator Appropriate
If more than one relationship designator is appropriate because the same entity has multiple roles, preferably use repeating $e (or $j for MARC X11 fields). If necessary, multiple headings may be used instead. Add relationship designators in WEMI order.
Guideline 11: Relationship Designators for Families and Corporate Bodies
Note that the relationship designators in RDA Appendix I may be applied to families and corporate bodies as well as to individuals.
Guideline 12: Relationship Designators and Name/Title Access Points in 7XX
Appendix I relationship designators should not be used in a name/title access point tagged MARC 700- 711 or 800-811, or in a name/title linking field tagged MARC 76X-78X.
Guidelines for Appendix J Relationship Designators
Guideline 13: Relationship Designators for Resource-to-Resource Relationships
The use of relationship designators for resource-to-resource relationships is encouraged.
Guideline 14: Relationship Designator Implied by MARC 7XX Content Designation
If a cataloger wishes to indicate a known relationship to a known resource, and the $i relationship information subfield is defined for the MARC 7XX field being used, provide a relationship designator. Do so even if the field coding otherwise already expresses a relationship.
Guideline 15: Multiple Relationships
Where multiple relationships exist, e.g., an abridged translation, provide separate access points, each with a single relationship designator in a single $i subfield. Alternatively, identify one relationship as primary and record that relationship alone.
Guideline 16: Reciprocal Relationships for Sequential Works and/or Expressions
Except in the case of sequential work or expression relationships and equivalent manifestation relationships for serials, it is not necessary to provide reciprocal relationship fields.
Guideline 17: Relationship Designator for Related Resource when MARC 130 or 240 is Present
Catalogers may add a 7XX field with a relationship designator referring to a specific related resource even if a 130 or 240 field is already present implying that they are versions of the same work.
Guideline 18: Unknown or Uncertain Relationship in a Resource
If there is reason to believe that the resource being cataloged is related to another resource, but the resource in question cannot be identified (e.g., in the case of an expression that is believed to be a translation but the original is unknown), give the information in a note.
Guideline 19: Related Resource with Same Principally Responsible Creator
When constructing a reference to a related resource sharing the same principally responsible creator as the resource being described, record the authorized access point for the related entity in a 700/710/711/730 author-title access point explicitly naming the creator in its $a, rather than a 740 title entry with an implied relationship to the 1XX in the same record.
Guideline 20: Unstructured Descriptions
For unstructured descriptions it is not necessary to indicate the WEMI level at which the relationship is asserted.
Punctuation and Capitalization
Designators that Follow Authorized Access Points
Relationship designators that follow authorized access points are not capitalized and are always preceded by a comma, unless the authorized access point ends in an open date.
Designators that Precede Authorized Access Points or Appear at the Beginning of a Field
Relationship designators that precede authorized access points or that appear at the beginning of a field are capitalized and are followed by a colon.